4.5 Article

Survival after liver resection and liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases: a comparative analysis stratified by metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT

Journal

HPB
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1055-1062

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Oslo University Hospital
  2. Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
  3. Norwegian Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the survival outcomes of resection and liver transplantation in patients with moderate metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in colorectal liver metastases. The results showed that liver transplantation had significantly higher overall survival and post-recurrence survival compared to resection.
Background: Many patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) recur with poor survival. Overall survival (OS) following liver transplantation (LT) for CRLM is reported to be about 80% at 5 years. In this study, survival following resection versus transplantation for CRLM in patients with moderate (6-70 cm3) metabolic tumor volume (MTV) from the preoperative positron emission toMethods: Disease-free survival (DFS), OS and post recurrence survival (PRS) following resection (n = 18) and LT (n = 12) was compared by using the Kaplan Meier method and log rank test for patients with moderate MTV. Results: Patients undergoing LT had unresectable metastases, significantly lower age, higher tumor burden score and number of liver metastases, longer time from diagnosis to surgery, and more patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OS at 5 years was 39% in the resection group and 83% in the LT group (P = 0.012). PRS was significantly improved in patients treated with LT compared to resection with 71% alive at 5 years from recurrence compared to 17% in the resection group (P = 0.017). Conclusion: LT for selected patients seems to be superior to resection as treatment for CRLM for patients with moderate MTV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available