4.6 Review

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Ischemic Stroke: From Bench to Bedside and Beyond

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.781098

Keywords

sphingosine-1-phosphate; ischemic stroke; fingolimod; neuroprotective agent; translational research

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82071380, 81873743, 81801223]
  2. Tongji Hospital (HUST) Foundation for Excellent Young Scientist [2020YQ06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

S1P signaling plays a crucial role in the treatment of ischemic stroke by regulating immune cell migration, sustaining endothelial function, and maintaining blood-brain barrier integrity. Understanding the role of S1P signaling in stroke and the ability to finely regulate the signal pathway are essential for the success of bench-to-bedside translation in the future.
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling is being increasingly recognized as a strong modulator of immune cell migration and endothelial function. Fingolimod and other S1P modulators in ischemic stroke treatment have shown promise in emerging experimental models and small-scale clinical trials. In this article, we will review the current knowledge of the role of S1P signaling in brain ischemia from the aspects of inflammation and immune interventions, sustaining endothelial functions, regulation of blood-brain barrier integrity, and functional recovery. We will then discuss the current and future therapeutic perspectives of targeting S1P for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Mechanism studies would help to bridge the gap between preclinical studies and clinical practice. Future success of bench-to-bedside translation shall be based on in depth understanding of S1P signaling during stroke and on the ability to have a fine temporal and spatial regulation of the signal pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available