4.6 Article

Skin tear prevalence in an Australian acute care hospital: A 10-year analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1418-1427

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13735

Keywords

acute care; hospital-acquired; prevalence; skin tears; wound management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of skin tears in a tertiary acute care hospital in Queensland, Australia over a decade. The findings showed an overall downward trend in hospital-acquired skin tears, with a majority of patients aged 70 and above having multiple skin tears. Most tears were caused by falls or collisions, suggesting combined strategies for fall and skin tear prevention may be effective.
Hospital-acquired skin tear prevalence is under-reported; thus, the aim of this study was to analyse skin tear point prevalence and characteristics in a tertiary acute care hospital in Queensland, Australia, over a 10-year period. All consenting adult inpatients received a full skin inspection and skin tear category, site, cause, treatment, and whether it was documented as hospital- or community-acquired were recorded. Eleven prevalence audits were analysed with a total sample of 3626 patients. An overall pooled prevalence of 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.5-10.4) with an associated hospital-acquired pooled prevalence of 5.5% (95% CI 4.5-6.7) was found. In total, 616 skin tears were reported, of which 374 (60.7%) were hospital-acquired. Over a third of patients (38.7%) had multiple skin tears and most patients (84.8%) with at least one skin tear were aged >= 70 years. The largest proportion of skin tears (40.1%) was those with no skin flap. Of those documented, most were caused by falls or collisions, suggesting combined skin tear and falls prevention strategies may be effective. Over a decade, there was a downward trend in hospital-acquired skin tear, which is encouraging. Skin tear prevalence is recommended as a measure of care quality with an emphasis on good quality documentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available