4.2 Article

Radiation Exposure During Diagnostic and Therapeutic Angiography of Carotid-cavernous Fistula A Retrospective Single Center Observational Study

Journal

CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 117-122

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01126-x

Keywords

Radiation exposure; Carotid-cavernous fistula; Embolization; Interventional neuroradiology; Cerebral angiography

Funding

  1. University Medicine Essen Academy (UMEA) program - German Research Foundation (DFG) [FU356/12-1]
  2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine local diagnostic reference levels during endovascular diagnostics and therapy of carotid-cavernous fistulas. Different dose levels were observed between diagnostic angiography and embolization for CCF, with embolization having significantly higher doses.
Purpose The aim of this study was to determine local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) during endovascular diagnostics and therapy of carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCF). Methods In a retrospective study design, DRLs, achievable dose (AD) and mean values were assessed for all patients with CCF undergoing diagnostic angiography (I) or embolization (II). All procedures were performed with the flat-panel angiography system Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Interventional procedures were differentiated according to the type of CCF and the type of procedure. Results In total, 86 neurointerventional procedures of 48 patients with CCF were executed between February 2010 and July 2021. The following DRLs, AD and mean values could be determined: (I) DRL 215 Gy center dot cm(2), AD 169 Gy center dot cm(2), mean 165 Gy center dot cm(2); (II) DRL 350 Gy center dot cm(2), AD 226 Gy center dot cm(2), mean 266 Gy center dot cm(2). Dose levels of embolization were significantly higher compared to diagnostic angiography (p < 0.001). No significant dose difference was observed with respect to the type of fistula or the embolization method. Conclusion This article reports on diagnostic and therapeutic DRLs in the management of CCF that could serve as a benchmark for the national radiation protection authorities. Differentiation by fistula type or embolization method does not seem to be useful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available