4.2 Article

Disaster Preparedness Among Populations in Shenzhen, China, With and Without Chronic Disease

Journal

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2021.354

Keywords

disaster preparedness; disaster planning; perceptions of disaster; chronic disease

Funding

  1. School of Nursing, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the perception and preparedness for disasters among residents with and without chronic diseases in Shenzhen, China. The findings showed that although participants with chronic diseases were better prepared, overall, the residents of Shenzhen were inadequately prepared for disasters and in need of public education.
Objective: This survey examined and compared the disaster perception and preparedness of 2421 residents with and without chronic disease in Shenzhen, China. Methods: The participants were recruited and were asked to complete a survey in 2018. Results: Three types of disasters considered most likely to happen in Shenzhen were: typhoons (73.5% vs 74.9%), major transport accidents (61.5% vs 64.7%), and major fires (60.8% vs 63.0%). Only 5.9% and 5% of them, respectively, considered infectious diseases pandemics to be likely. There were significant differences between those with and without chronic disease in disaster preparedness, only a small percentage could be considered to have prepared for disaster (20.7% vs 14.5%). Logistic regression analyses showed that those aged 65 or older (odds ratio [OR] = 2.76), who had attained a Master's degree or higher (OR = 2.0), and with chronic disease (OR = 1.38) were more prepared for disasters. Conclusions: Although participants with chronic disease were better prepared than those without, overall, Shenzhen residents were inadequately prepared for disasters and in need of public education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available