4.5 Article

Old Corrugated Container (OCC) Cardboard Material: An Alternative Source for Obtaining Microfibrillated Cellulose

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages 9296-9308

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1982820

Keywords

Microfibrillated cellulose; cellulosic nanofiber; Old Corrugated Container (OCC); recycled fiber; mechanical fibrillation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the preparation of microfibrillated cellulose using lignocellulosic fibers from OCC cardboard and evaluated the effects of chemical treatments. Chemical treatment was found to improve the properties of the lignocellulosic materials, allowing for more efficient and environmentally friendly fibrillation processes using unbleached OCC fibers.
Nowadays, there is a growing interest in lignocellulosic nanoscale materials produced from alternative recycled sources because of their attractive physical, chemical, and mechanical properties, as well as their ecological contribution. In this work, MFC preparation through mechanical fibrillation using lignocellulosic fibers from OCC cardboard was investigated. Also, the effect of alkaline pulping and bleaching treatments was also evaluated in a comparative study. The fibers' and microfibers' morphology were determined by light microscopy, SEM, and TEM. The structural and chemical characterizations of the samples were inspected by intrinsic viscosity, FTIR, and XRD. The chemical treatment improved effects on the kappa number, morphology, and crystallinity of the lignocellulosic materials. The fibrillation process in a colloidal mill was possible using unbleached OCC fibers, contributing to a more efficient and environmentally friendly procedure. The OCC is a promising alternative source to produce microfibrillated cellulose with suitable properties and high potential in renewable material applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available