4.6 Review

The Role of RASs/RVs in the Current Management of HCV

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13102096

Keywords

HCV; viral resistance; DAA; RAS

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The approval of combination therapies with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens has led to significant progress in the field of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. However, resistance to DAAs is a major issue, with resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) having an impact on sustained virological response (SVR) rates. Different RASs in NS3, NS5A and NS5B are linked with reduced susceptibility to DAAs, and DAA-resistant HCV variant haplotypes (RVs) are dominant in cases of virological failure.
The approval of combination therapies with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens has led to significant progress in the field of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. Although most patients treated with these agents achieve a virological cure, resistance to DAAs is a major issue. The rapid emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), in particular in the context of incomplete drug pressure, has an impact on sustained virological response (SVR) rates. Several RASs in NS3, NS5A and NS5B have been linked with reduced susceptibility to DAAs. RAS vary based on HCV characteristics and the different drug classes. DAA-resistant HCV variant haplotypes (RVs) are dominant in cases of virological failure. Viruses with resistance to NS3-4A protease inhibitors are only detected in the peripheral blood in a time frame ranging from weeks to months following completion of treatment, whereas NS5A inhibitor-resistant viruses may persist for years. Novel agents have been developed that demonstrate promising results in DAA-experienced patients. The recent approval of broad-spectrum drug combinations with a high genetic barrier to resistance and antiviral potency may overcome the problem of resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available