4.6 Review

Cardiomyopathy Associated with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: What Do We Know?

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13122493

Keywords

myocarditis; pericarditis; vaccines; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; epidemiology; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to global efforts to curb its impact, with vaccination being the most effective method in preventing hospitalization and death. Adverse effects like myocarditis and pericarditis, mainly associated with mRNA vaccines, have low frequency and the specific mechanisms behind them are still unclear.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has mobilized many efforts worldwide to curb its impact on morbidity and mortality. Vaccination of the general population has resulted in the administration of more than 6,700,000,000 doses by the end of October 2021, which is the most effective method to prevent hospitalization and death. Among the adverse effects described, myocarditis and pericarditis are low-frequency events (less than 10 per 100,000 people), mainly observed with messenger RNA vaccines. The mechanisms responsible for these effects have not been specified, considering an exacerbated and uncontrolled immune response and an autoimmune response against specific cardiomyocyte proteins. This greater immunogenicity and reactogenicity is clinically manifested in a differential manner in pediatric patients, adults, and the elderly, determining specific characteristics of its presentation for each age group. It generally develops as a condition of mild to moderate severity, whose symptoms and imaging findings are self-limited, resolving favorably in days to weeks and, exceptionally, reporting deaths associated with this complication. The short- and medium-term prognosis is favorable, highlighting the lack of data on long-term evolution, which should be determined in longer follow-ups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available