4.6 Review

Sendai Virus and a Unified Model of Mononegavirus RNA Synthesis

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13122466

Keywords

Sendai virus; mononegavirus; RNA synthesis

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Government through the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI)
  2. European Research Council Advanced Grant
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-19-CE15-0024, ANR-21-CE15-0026]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-19-CE15-0024, ANR-21-CE15-0026] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

VSV and SeV are members of the Mononegavirales order, studying these viruses can provide insights into their genetic information expression and RNA synthesis processes, as well as the characteristics of their nucleocapsid, helping to establish a unified model based on commonalities among these viruses.
Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), the founding member of the mononegavirus order (Mononegavirales), was found to be a negative strand RNA virus in the 1960s, and since then the number of such viruses has continually increased with no end in sight. Sendai virus (SeV) was noted soon afterwards due to an outbreak of newborn pneumonitis in Japan whose putative agent was passed in mice, and nowadays this mouse virus is mainly the bane of animal houses and immunologists. However, SeV was important in the study of this class of viruses because, like flu, it grows to high titers in embryonated chicken eggs, facilitating the biochemical characterization of its infection and that of its nucleocapsid, which is very close to that of measles virus (MeV). This review and opinion piece follow SeV as more is known about how various mononegaviruses express their genetic information and carry out their RNA synthesis, and proposes a unified model based on what all MNV have in common.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available