4.5 Article

Parameter identification of a second-gradient model for the description of pantographic structures in dynamic regime

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-021-01620-9

Keywords

Parameter identification; Dynamic load; Pantographic structure; Finite element method (FEM); Continuum mechanics; Experimental test

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study validates parameters of a reduced-order model for a pantographic structure through experimental tests and mathematical modeling, assessing the performance of the model in the dynamic regime. The research finds good agreement in the model far away from eigenfrequencies, with discrepancies near the eigenfrequencies possibly indicating the significance of higher-order inertia in the model.
Pantographic structures are examples of metamaterials with such a microstructure that higher-gradient terms' role is increased in the mechanical response. In this work, we aim for validating parameters of a reduced-order model for a pantographic structure. Experimental tests are carried out by applying forced oscillation to 3D-printed specimens for a range of frequencies. A second-gradient coarse-grained nonlinear model is utilized for obtaining a homogenized 2D description of the pantographic structure. By inverse analysis and through an automatized optimization algorithm, the parameters of the model are identified for the corresponding pantographic structure. By comparing the displacement plots, the performance of the model and the identified parameters are assessed for dynamic regime. Qualitative and quantitative analyses for different frequency ranges are performed. A good agreement is present far away from the eigenfrequencies. The discrepancies near the eigenfrequencies are a possible indication of the significance of higher-order inertia in the model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available