4.6 Article

New prognostic model for patients with advanced gastric cancer: Fluoropyrimidine/platinum doublet for first-line chemotherapy

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 48, Pages 8357-8369

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i48.8357

Keywords

Stomach neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Prognosis; Validation; Gastric cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing clinical data of MRGC patients, six prognostic factors were identified. A simple and effective prognostic model was developed based on these factors, which can help predict patients' survival rates.
BACKGROUNDNew prognostic factors have been reported in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC), necessitating modifications to the previous prognostic model.AIMTo develop a new model, MRGC patients who received fluoropyrimidines/platinum doublet chemotherapy between 2008 and 2015 were analyzed.METHODSA total of 1883 patients was divided into a training set (n = 937) and an independent validation set (n = 946).RESULTSMultivariate analysis showed that the following six factors were associated with poor overall survival (OS) in the training set: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score & GE; 2 and bone metastasis (2 points each), peritoneal metastasis, high alkaline phosphatase level, low albumin level, and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (1 point each). A prognostic model was developed by stratifying patients into good (0-1 point), moderate (2-3 points), and poor (& GE; 4 points) risk groups. In the validation set, the median OS of the three risk groups was 15.8, 10.1, and 5.7 mo, respectively, and those differences were significant (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONWe identified six factors readily measured in clinical practice that are predictive of poor prognosis in patients with MRGC. The new model is simpler than the old and more easily predicts OS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available