4.6 Article

Inverse analysis of oxygen diffusivity in oak wood using the back-face method: application to cooperage

Journal

WOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 219-239

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-021-01325-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Association Nationale pour la Recherche et la Technologie (CIFRE convention)
  2. Chene Cie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determined the oxygen diffusivity in oak wood using inverse analysis with the back-face method and concurrently conducted experiments on multiple samples to assess the impact of several parameters in a reasonable time frame. The results revealed the high heterogeneity of oak wood, with low values of oxygen diffusion coefficient, indicating the significant tortuosity of oak wood in its tangential direction compared to oxygen diffusion in air.
During the aging of wines and spirits in oak barrels, oxygen diffusion through the wood occurs and leads to mild oxygenation of the beverage. In this study, the oxygen diffusivity in oak wood was determined by inverse analysis using the back-face method. In the measurement setup, a defined oxygen concentration was applied to the front of a sample and the variation of oxygen concentration due to gas diffusion through the sample was measured on the back. The experiment was carried out simultaneously on several samples. It was then possible to study 36 samples and to assess the effect of several parameters in a reasonable time. A finite volume model using the actual experimental conditions as boundary conditions was implemented for the identification of the diffusion coefficient. The obtained values range between 4.64 x 10(-11) and 2.02 x 10(-9) m(2) s(-1) and highlight the high heterogeneity of oak wood. Such low values, compared to the diffusion of oxygen in air (a factor 10(5) lower), reflect the huge tortuosity of oak wood in its tangential direction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available