4.7 Article

Quantifying the Uncertainty Created by Non-Transferable Model Calibrations Across Climate and Land Cover Scenarios: A Case Study With SWMM

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021WR031603

Keywords

SWMM; uncertainty; effective parameters; urban runoff; modeling; non-stationarity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's Engineering Research Center for Reinventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt) [EEC-1028968]
  2. Beatrix Farrand Fund (Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, University of California Berkeley)
  3. Gledden Fellowship (University of Western Australia)
  4. Dissertation Completion Fellowship (University of California, Berkeley)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictions of urban runoff can be affected by errors caused by changes in calibrated effective model parameters. This calibration parameter transfer uncertainty can undermine the usefulness of urban hydrologic models in important applications. Further research is needed to improve the robustness of predictions using urban hydrologic models.
Predictions of urban runoff are heavily reliant on semi-distributed models, which simulate runoff at subcatchment scales. These models often use effective model parameters that average across the small-scale heterogeneity. Here we quantify the error in model prediction that arises when the optimal calibrated value of effective parameters changes with model forcing. The uncertainty this produces, which we refer to as calibration parameter transfer uncertainty, can undermine the usefulness of important applications of urban hydrologic models, for example, to predict the hydrologic response to novel climate or development scenarios. Using the urban hydrologic model SWMM (Stormwater Management Model) as a case study, we quantify the transferability of two calibrated effective parameters: subcatchment width and connected impervious area. Through numerical experiments, we simulate overland flow across a highly simplified synthetic urban landscape subject to a range of scenarios (combinations of storm events, soil types, and impervious areas). For each scenario, we calibrate SWMM width and connected impervious area parameters to the outcomes of a distributed model. We find that the calibrated values of these parameters vary with soil, storm, and land cover forcing. This variation across forcing parameters can result in prediction errors up to a magnitude of 60% when a calibrated SWMM is used to predict runoff following changes in climate and land cover. Such calibration transfer uncertainty is largely unaccounted for in urban hydrologic modeling. These results point to a need for additional research to determine how to use urban hydrologic models to make robust predictions across future conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available