4.6 Article

Effect of Chelant-Based Soil Washing and Post-Treatment on Pb, Cd, and Zn Bioavailability and Plant Uptake

Journal

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Volume 232, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-021-05356-0

Keywords

Toxic metals; Remediation; Soil pollution; Zero-valent iron; Vermicompost; Biochar

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 3408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that ex situ EDTA washing significantly reduced the concentrations of heavy metals in soil and decreased plant uptake of Cd and Zn. The addition of zero-valent iron effectively reduced residual EDTA and increased Pb retention, while organic amendments had a minor impact on Pb behavior.
The remediation of Pb, Cd, and Zn contaminated soil by ex situ EDTA washing was investigated in two pot experiments. We tested the influence of (i) 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5%wt zero-valent iron (ZVI) and (ii) a combination of 5%wt vermicompost, 2%wt biochar, and 1%wt ZVI on the metal availability in EDTA-washed soil using different soil extracts (Aqua regia, NH4NO3) and plant concentrations. We found that EDTA soil washing significantly reduced the total concentration of Pb, Cd, and Zn and significantly reduced the Cd and Zn plant uptake. Residual EDTA was detected in water extracts causing the formation of highly available Pb-EDTA complexes. While organic amendments had no significant effect on Pb behavior in washed soils, an amendment of >= 1%wt ZVI successfully reduced EDTA concentrations, Pb bioavailability, and plant uptake. Our results suggest that Pb-EDTA complexes adsorb to a Fe oxyhydroxide layer, quickly developing on the ZVI surface. The increase in ZVI application strongly decreases Zn concentrations in plant tissue, whereas the uptake of Cd was not reduced, but even slightly increased. Soil washing did not affect plant productivity and organic amendments improved biomass production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available