4.4 Article

In situ cytokine gene expression in early stage of virulent Newcastle disease in chickens

Journal

VETERINARY PATHOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 75-81

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03009858211045945

Keywords

cytokines; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization; lymphocytes; Newcastle disease; poultry; avian orthoavulavirus 1; avian paramyxovirus 1; immunology

Funding

  1. USDA CRIS Project [6040-32000-072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that young chickens showed a strong pro-inflammatory cytokine response post-infection, while older hens had lower cytokine expression with more prolonged infiltration of T and B cells. Age difference may contribute to variations in disease severity.
Selected lymphoid and reproductive tissues were examined from groups of 3-week-old chickens and 62-week-old hens that were inoculated choanally and conjunctivally with 10(6) EID50 of a virulent Newcastle disease virus (NDV) isolate from the California 2018-2020 outbreak, and euthanized at 1, 2, and 3 days postinfection. In the 3-week-old chickens, immunohistochemistry for NDV and for T and B cell lymphocytes, as well as in situ hybridization for IL-1 beta, IL-6, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha revealed extensive expression of IL-1 beta and IL-6 in lymphoid tissues, often coinciding with NDV antigen. IFN-gamma was only expressed infrequently in the same lymphoid tissues, and TNF-alpha was rarely expressed. T-cell populations initially expanded but by day 3 their numbers were below control levels. B cells underwent a similar expansion but remained elevated in some tissues, notably spleen, cecal tonsils, and cloacal bursa. Cytokine expression in the 62-week-old hens was overall lower than in the 3-week-old birds, and there was more prolonged infiltration of both T and B cells in the older birds. The strong pro-inflammatory cytokine response in young chickens is proposed as the reason for more severe disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available