4.6 Article

The correlation between anisotropic magnetoresistance and phase separation in La0.4Pr0.3Ca0.3MnO3/NGO films

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110437

Keywords

Manganites; Thin-film; Anisotropic magnetoresistance; Phase separation

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) and phase separation in LPCMO/NGO films was investigated in this study. It was found that by adjusting the annealing process and target substrate distance, the crystalline orientation of the films can be modified, leading to changes in the metal insulator transition (MIT) temperature and magnetoresistance (MR).
In this paper, the relationship between anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) and phase separation in La0.4Pr0.3Ca0.3MnO3 (LPCMO)/NGO films has been investigated. The films were grown on orthorhombic NGO (001) single crystal substrates by the pulsed laser deposition (PLD) method. The as-grown films were ex-situ annealed at 780 degrees C for 30 min in 400 mTorr oxygen pressures to clarify the effects of annealing on magneto resistance (MR) and AMR. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern confirmed that the substrate distance from the target is a key parameter for strong preferred crystallographic orientation growth. The temperature-dependent resistivity of the as-grown films revealed the coexistence of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases and the frozen glassy state at low temperatures. In the film with significant phase coexistence, the considerably large AMR and MR values of about 140% and 100% are achieved under the 5 kOe magnetic field. By tuning the target substrate distance, different crystalline orientations of LPCMO can be obtained, and as a result, the metal insulator transition (MIT) temperature, MR, and AMR can be modified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available