4.5 Article

Transient sensory symptoms among first-dose recipients of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: A case-control study

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 39, Issue 48, Pages 6975-6979

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.058

Keywords

AEFI; Adverse event; Immunization; BNT162b2; COVID-19; Immunization stress-related response; Paresthesia; SARS-CoV-2

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico (COVID-19 Fund) [F0005-2020-01, 311790]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are effective, but persistent vaccine hesitancy is partly due to a misperception of their potential adverse events. This study described the anatomy and associated factors of developing NSSS among BNT162b2 recipients, suggesting that the benign nature of these symptoms may help dissipate hesitation towards this vaccine.
mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are effective; however, persistent vaccine hesitancy is partly due to a misperception of their potential adverse events. Non-specific sensory symptoms (NSSS) following immunization are thought to be mediated by stress-related responses. In this case-control study, we evaluated NSSS from a cohort of 7,812,845 BNT162b2 first-dose recipients, of whom 10,929 reported an adverse event following immunization (AEFI). We found an overall frequency of 3.4% (377 cases) or 4.8 cases per 100,000 doses administered. Anatomically, the arms (61%) and face/neck region (36.2%) were the most commonly affected sites. The control group had significantly higher rates of reactogenicityassociated symptoms, suggesting that NSSS are reactogenicity-independent; in multivariable analysis, healthcare workers reported sensory symptoms less frequently (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.72; p < 0.001). This is the first study describing the topography and associated factors for developing NSSS among BNT162b2 recipients. The benign nature of these symptoms may help dissipate hesitation towards this vaccine. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available