4.7 Article

Transient thermal performance response characteristics of porous-medium receiver heated by multi-dish concentrator

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.03.028

Keywords

Porous medium; LTNE; Transient state; Solar collector; MCRT; User-defined functions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406239, 51336002]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015 M580261]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Shandong [ZR2014EEP001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transient thermal performance response characteristics of porous-medium receiver have a major impact on the operability of a solar thermal power plant (STPP). To investigate the transient thermal performance response characteristics of porous-medium receiver, method coupled to the Monte Carlo ray tracing (MCRT) and finite volume method (FVM) was developed to establish a 2D transient state heat-transfer model using a local thermal non-equilibrium (LTNE) calculation. The effects of the fluid thermophysical characteristics, the fluid-phase type, and the solid-phase thermal conductivity on the unsteady-state heat-transfer performance were investigated to determine the transient thermal performance response characteristics of porous-medium receiver. The numerical results indicated that the variation in the air thermophysical properties due to the high working temperature can induce a very small transient thermal performance response in porous-medium receiver (a maximum deviation of 1.9% was observed in this study). A porous-medium receiver with a high thermal conductivity can benefit from the dispersion of concentrated energy. The dimensionless solid-phase temperature eon the center point of receiver in case of lambda = 40 W/(m.K) was 1.05 at t = 240 s, decreasing to 0.92 in case of lambda = 120 W/(m.K). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available