4.6 Article

The determinants of shared bike use in China

Journal

TRANSPORTATION
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 1-23

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-021-10235-y

Keywords

Free-floating bike share; Two-stage Bayesian multilevel hurdle model; China household finance survey; Social context; Nonlinear

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the determinants of participation in and usage of free-floating bike share (FBS) using a nationally representative dataset in China. The study finds that ICT use significantly affects both participation and usage of FBS, while social context only has a significant effect on participation. Nonlinear effects of age and annual individual income on FBS usage are also identified. The findings provide policy suggestions for promoting FBS use.
Free-floating bike share (FBS) represents a new generation of bike share schemes and provides mobility opportunities that influence people's daily travel. Understanding the determinants of FBS use can provide a basis for the further development of bike share programs and support related policymaking. Previous studies have used survey data with rather small samples and have focused only on FBS users while ignoring nonusers. The influences of information and communication technology (ICT) use and social context are under-researched. By using a dataset that is nationally representative of the potential users of FBS in China, this study applied a two-stage Bayesian multilevel hurdle model to investigate participation in and the corresponding usage of FBS. The independent variables include sociodemographics, ICT use, travel characteristics, physical environment, and social context. We found that ICT use has a significant effect on both participation in and the usage of FBS, social context only has a significant effect on participation in FBS, and age and annual individual income have nonlinear effects on the usage of FBS. This study provides policymakers and FBS operators with suggestions for promoting FBS use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available