4.7 Article

Semi-solid processing of aluminum and magnesium alloys: Status, opportunity, and challenge in China

Journal

TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 3255-3280

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65729-1

Keywords

semi-solid processing; aluminum alloys; magnesium alloys; slurry preparation; numerical modeling; performance; industrial applications

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission, China [KQTD20170328154443162, JCYJ20180305123432756]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semi-solid processing of aluminum and magnesium alloys is considered a competitive approach in China due to its low cost, short process, and low energy consumption. This paper reviews common slurry preparation methods, discusses performance and microstructural evolution, and presents industrial applications in China. Special attention is given to unresolved issues and future directions.
Owing to its low cost, short process and low energy consumption, semi-solid processing (SSP) of aluminum (Al) and magnesium (Mg) alloys has been considered as a competitive approach to fabricate complicated components with excellent performance. Over the past decade, significant progress has been achieved in deeply understanding the SSP process, the microstructure and performance of the fabricated components in China. This paper starts with a retrospective overview of some common slurry preparation methods, followed by presenting the performance and the underlying mechanisms of SSP fabricated alloys. Then, the mainstream opinions on the microstructure evolution and rheological flow behavior of semi-solid slurry are discussed. Subsequently, the general situation and some recent examples of industrial applications of SSP are presented. Finally, special attention is paid to the unresolved issues and the future directions in SSP of Al and Mg alloys in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available