4.4 Article

Factors influencing the removal of patulin by cysteine

Journal

TOXICON
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages 51-57

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.09.019

Keywords

Patulin; Cysteine; Influencing factor; Kinetics; Removal mechanism

Funding

  1. Major Projects of Natural Science Research in Universities and Colleges in Jiangsu Province, China [19KJA430012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cysteine can effectively remove patulin in phosphoric acid buffer solution under high temperature and high acidic conditions. Factors influencing the removal efficiency include reaction temperature, pH of the reactive media, molar ratio between cysteine and patulin, and reaction time. The removal process can be simulated by various kinetic models with high correlation coefficients.
The removal of patulin in phosphoric acid buffer solution by cysteine was investigated. Cysteine could effectively decrease the patulin concentration at high acidic condition (pH 3.0-5.0) with the help of high temperature greater than 90 degrees C. Three removal mechanisms of patulin by cysteine under high acidic and high temperature conditions were deduced. Reaction temperature, pH of reactive media, molar ratio between cysteine and patulin, and reaction time were all the obvious factors influencing the removal efficiency of patulin, and the increase of any one factor could significantly improve the removal efficiency of patulin. The removal process of patulin could be simulated by the zero-order kinetic model, logarithmic model, and pseudo-first-order kinetic model, respectively, and the corresponding correlation coefficients (R2) were all greater than 0.90. Presently, this method can only be applied for the removal of patulin in contaminated water from washing fruits in juice processing industry due to the high treatment temperature more than 120 degrees C and the long detoxification time greater than 1 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available