4.6 Review

Tissue engineering in dermatology-from lab to market

Journal

TISSUE & CELL
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101717

Keywords

Regenerative medicine; Tissue engineering; Dermatology; Regeneration; Skin substitutes; Market

Funding

  1. Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue Engineering is a regenerative medical technology that replaces damaged tissue using appropriate scaffolding, living cells, and growth factors. In the field of dermatology, tissue engineering has evolved from single applications to the use of cell and scaffold combinations for the treatment of acute and chronic skin wounds.
Tissue Engineering is a branch of regenerative medical technology which helps replace damaged tissue using appropriate scaffolding, living cells, and growth factors. Using tissue engineering products can be a promising method for treating skin lesions such as wounds and deep burns. The interaction and interconnection of cells within the bio-culture medium or within a three-dimensional scaffold provides the conditions for tissue regeneration and subsequent healing of skin wounds. Tissue engineering in the field of dermatology has evolved over time from a single application of skin cells or biopolymer scaffolds to the use of cell and scaffold combinations for the treatment, repair, and closure of acute and chronic skin wounds. It has evolved. This technology has reached a point where most products are accepted, and the body rejects a small number, which strengthens the tissue engineering market. In this article, we aimed to review and study the market of this field by reviewing various articles on tissue engineering in the field of dermatology. Tissue-engineered skin substitutes are future options for wound healing and tissue regeneration strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available