4.7 Article

Characterization of progressive damage behaviour and failure mechanism of carbon fibre reinforced DP590 laminates

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108293

Keywords

DP590; CFRP; Tensile test; Three-point bending; Carbon fibre-reinforced polymer; Progressive damage analysis; VUMAT

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873146]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China [E2019202106]
  3. Tianjin Municipal Government of China [2018KJ262, 19JCTPJC43700, YFZCGX00780]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the progressive damage behavior and failure mechanism of high-strength metal (HSS) / carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates under tensile and three-point bending loadings using experiments and numerical simulations. The outcomes showed typical failure modes under different loading conditions.
The progressive damage behaviour and failure mechanism of high-strength metal(HSS)/carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates under tensile and three-point bending loadings are investigated in this paper. Experiments and numerical simulations are used to study the hybrid composite laminates' mechanical properties and failure mechanisms. The tensile failure mode of the DP590/CFRP laminate was a typical mixed failure mode. The metal layer presented the necking and fracture modes, and CFRP layer showed neat fibre fractures, resin matrix sections and fibre pull-out phenomena. The bending test demonstrated that the failure modes of DP590/CFRP composite laminates under the three-point bending loading were mainly included matrix failure, fibre fracture failure, and internal delamination. The typical bilinear behaviour was observed on the load-deflection curve of the DP590/CFRP composite laminate under the three-point bending loading. The established FEA-VUMAT model can accurately predict tensile, bending responses and failure mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available