4.3 Article

Primary Care Physician Adherence to Telepsychiatry Recommendations: Intermediate Outcomes from a Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal

TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 838-846

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0389

Keywords

telemedicine; telepsychiatry; collaborative care; remote consultation; community psychiatry; mental health services

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [R01HS024949-01]
  2. University of California
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1 TR001860, TL1TR001861]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the adherence of primary care physicians to clinical recommendations given by psychiatrists in asynchronous telepsychiatry (ATP) and synchronous telepsychiatry (STP) consultations. The results showed no statistically significant difference in adherence between ATP and STP, supporting the feasibility and acceptability of both forms of telepsychiatry for collaborative psychiatric care.
Objective: To compare clinical recommendations given by psychiatrists and the adherence to these recommendations by primary care physicians (PCP) following consultations conducted by asynchronous telepsychiatry (ATP) and synchronous telepsychiatry (STP). Materials and Methods: ATP and STP consultations were compared using intermediate data from a randomized clinical trial with adult participant enrollment between April 2014 and December 2017. In both study arms, PCPs received written recommendations from the psychiatrist after each encounter. Independent clinicians reviewed PCP documentation to measure adherence to those recommendations in the 6 months following the baseline consultation. Results: Medical records were reviewed for 645 psychiatrists' consult recommendations; 344 from 61 ATP consultations and 301 from 62 STP consultations. Of those recommendations, 191 (56%) and 173 (58%) were rated fully adherent by two independent raters for ATP and STP, respectively. In a multilevel ordinal logistic regression model adjusted for recommendation type and recommended implementation timing, there was no statistically significant difference in adherence to recommendations for ATP compared with STP (adjusted odds ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-1.62). The profiles of recommendation type were comparable between ATP and STP. Conclusions: This is the first PCP adherence study comparing two forms of telemedicine. Although we did not find evidence of a difference between ATP and STP; this study supports the feasibility and acceptability of ATP and STP for the provision of collaborative psychiatric care. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT02084979.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available