4.6 Review

Clinical efficacy and safety of robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Surgery

Morbidity and short-term surgical outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large cohort study

Li Zheng-yan et al.

Summary: This study compared the outcomes of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) in treating gastric cancer. It found no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality between RDG and LDG, with RDG showing less blood loss and more retrieved lymph nodes. Age over 65 and ASA III were identified as major risk factors for complications.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)

Article Oncology

Cancer Statistics, 2021

Rebecca L. Siegel et al.

Summary: Every year, the American Cancer Society projects the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States, with the latest data showing a significant decline in lung cancer mortality, while prostate cancer mortality has plateaued and breast and colorectal cancer mortality have slowed. Improvements in treatment have accelerated progress against lung cancer, leading to a record drop in overall cancer mortality.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2021)

Article Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Taro Isobe et al.

Summary: Our study confirmed that RDG is a feasible and safe procedure for GC in terms of short-term surgical outcomes. A surgical robot might reduce postoperative severe complications and length of hospital stay.

BMC SURGERY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Global Incidence and Mortality of Gastric Cancer, 1980-2018

Martin C. S. Wong et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the incidence and mortality trends of gastric cancer globally from 1980 to 2018, showing a decrease in overall incidence and mortality rates. However, there is an increasing incidence of gastric cancer in younger populations in some countries, emphasizing the importance of preventive strategies for this age group.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)

Article Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes

Weisong Shen et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

Howard Balshem et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)

Review Surgery

Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Collective Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Yasuhiro Kodera et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2010)

Article Surgery

Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits

Min-Chan Kim et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2010)

Review Surgery

Robot-assisted abdominal surgery

CN Gutt et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2004)

Article Surgery

Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system

M Hashizume et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2002)