4.6 Article

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for proximal duodenal subepithelial lesions: a retrospective cohort study

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09068-2

Keywords

Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Duodenal subepithelial lesions

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai New-Star Youth Doctor Program [HWRS2020087]
  2. Scientific Research Program of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [18411966300]
  3. 234 Subject Climbing peak Program of Changhai Hospital, 2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs). The results showed that ESD is relatively safe and feasible for duodenal SELs, especially for lesions no more than 2 cm in size.
Background and aim Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used to remove subepithelial lesions (SELs) in recent years; however, duodenal ESD is associated with high rates of immediate or delayed bleeding and perforation. Whether ESD can be recommended for the treatment of duodenal SELs remains controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD for duodenal SELs. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 62 patients (62 lesions) who underwent ESD for duodenal SELs between January 2012 and December 2020. The therapeutic outcomes from ESD for duodenal SELs and procedure-related complications were analyzed. Results En bloc resection and complete resection rates associated with duodenal ESD were 90.3% and 100%, respectively; four patients had a positive microscopic margin on pathologic examination. The median procedure time was 45 min (range 20-106 min). During the procedure, two patients received emergency surgery for uncontrolled bleeding and perforation, respectively. After the procedure, delayed bleeding occurred in three patients (4.8%), which was successfully managed by clipping, and delayed perforation occurred in two patients (3.2%) and needed emergency surgery. Risk factors related to complications were analyzed. Lesion size was found to be significantly associated with the complications (P = 0.028). No recurrences were detected, and no distant metastasis was observed in any patient during a median follow-up period of 45.5 months (range, 6-103 months). Conclusion Duodenal ESD is relatively safe and feasible for duodenal SELs, especially for lesions no more than 2 cm in size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available