4.7 Article

Numerical modeling and experimental verification of residual stress distribution evolution of 12Cr2Ni4A steel generated by shot peening

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 430, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127993

Keywords

Shot peening; Coverage calculation method; Residual stress; Finite element method; Experimental verification

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Develop-ment Program of China [2018YFB2001300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the numerical calculation of residual stress in shot peening, proposing a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution model to calculate the number of impact shots. It also presents a method to calculate shot peening coverage using displacement and displacement gradient. A random multi-shot finite element model for high strength steel is established to study the effects of process parameters, initial surface morphology, and initial residual stress on residual stress distribution.
Shot peening is a widely used surface strengthening technique which can improve the fatigue life of metal components by introducing reasonably distributed compressive residual stress. The accurate prediction of re-sidual stress distribution of parts is a tough challenge in the simulation of shot peening. In this paper, the nu-merical calculation of the residual stress of shot peening is investigated with 12Cr2Ni4A steel as the target. A two-dimensional Gaussian distribution model is proposed to calculate the number of impact shots. A method is proposed to calculate shot peening coverage using displacement and displacement gradient, which increases the identification accuracy of peened surface topography and provides a scientific method for coverage calcu-lation. A random multi-shot finite element model for high strength steel is established considering the elasto-plastic of shot. The effects of the process parameters, initial surface morphology and initial residual stress on the residual stress distribution after shot peening are investigated. The accuracy of the proposed method is verified by comparing the measured and simulated results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available