4.7 Article

IceBreaker: Software for high-resolution single-particle cryo-EM with non-uniform ice

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 522-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.01.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of York and Diamond [Light Source Ltd] joint studentship
  2. UK Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [206422/Z/17/Z]
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/S003339/1]
  4. European Research Council [101021133]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/V000403/1]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [101021133] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the abundance of software tools, optimal particle selection remains a crucial issue in cryo-EM. IceBreaker is introduced as a valuable tool that estimates and equalizes the relative ice gradient, allowing differentiation of particles and improving selection performance. The software also introduces a parameter for local ice thickness, enabling particle grouping and filtering based on this parameter.
Despite the abundance of available software tools, optimal particle selection is still a vital issue in single-particle cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM). Regardless of the method used, most pickers struggle when ice thickness varies on a micrograph. IceBreaker allows users to estimate the relative ice gradient and flatten it by equalizing the local contrast. It allows the differentiation of particles from the background and improves overall particle picking performance. Furthermore, we introduce an additional parameter corresponding to local ice thickness for each particle. Particles with a defined ice thickness can be grouped and filtered based on this parameter during processing. These functionalities are especially valuable for on-the-fly processing to automatically pick as many particles as possible from each micrograph and to select optimal regions for data collection. Finally, estimated ice gradient distributions can be stored separately and used to inspect the quality of prepared samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available