4.7 Article

A tutorial on reproducing a predefined autocovariance function through AR models: application to stationary homogeneous isotropic turbulence

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-021-02156-0

Keywords

Random processes; Numerical generation; Autoregressive models; Autocovariance function; Turbulence

Funding

  1. CRUE-CSIC
  2. Springer Nature
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [860101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a novel method for determining optimal autoregressive models to reproduce a predefined target autocovariance function, utilizing flexibility and genetic algorithms to optimize the generated time series.
Sequential methods for synthetic realisation of random processes have a number of advantages compared with spectral methods. In this article, the determination of optimal autoregressive (AR) models for reproducing a predefined target autocovariance function of a random process is addressed. To this end, a novel formulation of the problem is developed. This formulation is linear and generalises the well-known Yule-Walker (Y-W) equations and a recent approach based on restricted AR models (Krenk-Moller approach, K-M). Two main features characterise the introduced formulation: (i) flexibility in the choice for the autocovariance equations employed in the model determination, and (ii) flexibility in the definition of the AR model scheme. Both features were exploited by a genetic algorithm to obtain optimal AR models for the particular case of synthetic generation of homogeneous stationary isotropic turbulence time series. The obtained models improved those obtained with the Y-W and K-M approaches for the same model parsimony in terms of the global fitting of the target autocovariance function. Implications for the reproduced spectra are also discussed. The formulation for the multivariate case is also presented, highlighting the causes behind some computational bottlenecks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available