4.5 Article

The Thermal Stability of Quenched and Partitioned Steel Microstructures

Journal

STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202100290

Keywords

dilatometry; martensite; microstructural stability; quenching and partitioning steels; retained austenite; tempering; thermomagnetometry

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ERC grant [306292]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quenching and partitioning process aims at creating steel microstructures composed of martensite and retained austenite. Experimental results show that the decomposition of retained austenite upon reheating occurs in two stages with a relatively low heating rate, and increasing the partitioning time can significantly improve the thermal stability of retained austenite.
The quenching and partitioning (Q&P) process is a heat treatment process, aiming at the creation of steel microstructures composed of martensite and retained austenite. Herein, the thermal stability of the microstructure is investigated upon reheating steel microstructures, created with different Q&P settings, in different thermal routes, using dilatometry and thermomagnetometry to quantitatively monitor phase fractions. Analysis of the derivative of dilatometry curves and thermomagnetic data reveals that upon reheating the retained austenite decomposes. The decomposition occurs in two stages when the heating rate is relatively low. The retained austenite completely transforms to ferrite and cementite upon reheating to 550 degrees C, followed by isothermal holding for 1800 s. Increasing the partitioning time from 50 to 300 s at 400 degrees C after quenching to 260 degrees C significantly increases the thermal stability of retained austenite. In all conditions, both carbon-depleted martensite (formed in the initial quenching step) and fresh martensite (formed in final Q&P quenching) are found to be partially tempered during the reheating experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available