4.6 Article

Industry payments to spine surgeons from 2014 to 2019 trends and comparison of payments to spine surgeons versus all physicians

Journal

SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 910-920

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.008

Keywords

Industry payments; Open payments database; Physician payments; Spine surgery; Spine manufacturers; Sunshine act

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed trends in medical industry payments to spine surgeons and all physicians from 2014 to 2019, finding that while payments to all physicians increased, payments to spine surgeons decreased, largely due to decreasing payments from the top eight device manufacturers with the highest level of surgeon payments.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The ethics of industry payments to physicians and the potential impact on healthcare costs and research outcomes have long been topics of debate. Industry payments to spine surgeons are frequently scrutinized. Transparency of industry relationships with physicians provides insight into their possible impact on clinical decision-making and utilization of care.PURPOSE: : To analyze trends in medical industry payments to spine surgeons and all physicians from 2014 to 2019, and further evaluate whether specific payments to spine surgeons vary based on company size.STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional investigation of publicly reported Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments Database (OPD)POPULATION SAMPLE: All US providers listed as receiving industry payments with further evaluation of payments to neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons.OUTCOME MEASURES: Main measures were the magnitude and trends of industry general and research payments and subcategories of general payments, such as royalty/license and consulting fees, to spine surgeons and comparison to all physicians over the six-year period. Variations in payment patterns among spine device manufacturers with the highest reported level of spine surgeon payments in 2019.METHODS: From 2014 to 2019 publicly reported general and research industry payments in the CMS OPD were analyzed. Trends in payments to all physicians were compared to trends in payments to neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons. Trends in payment patterns among spine device manufacturers with the highest payments in 2019 were determined. Linear regression analysis was completed to find statistically significant outcomes.RESULTS: Our investigation found an aggregate of $42,710,365,196 general and research payments reported to all physicians over the 6-year period, 2.6% ($1,112,936,203) of which went to spine surgeons. Industry general and research payments to spine surgeons decreased by 17.5% ($195,571,109, 2014; $161,283,683, 2019), while increasing by 8.7% ($6,706,208,391, 2014; $7,288,003,832, 2019) to all physicians. Industry research payments to spine surgeons were notably low each year and decreased to only 0.5% of research payments made to all physicians in 2019. Median payment received by spine surgeons as well as the overall distribution of payments to the 75th and 95th percentile significantly increased over the six-year period in comparison to the stable distribution of payments to all physicians. Top eight spine device manufactures with the highest level of spine surgeon payments accounted for 72.9% payments in 2014 but decreased payments by 17.6% to 2019 ($120,409,083.75, 2014; $99,283,264.49, 2019).CONCLUSIONS: Industry general and research payments to all physicians increased from 2014 to 2019 but decreased to spine surgeons, largely due to decreasing payments from eight device manufacturers with the highest level of surgeon payments. A small subset of spine surgeons continues to receive increasing payments. The implications of decreasing investments in research by industry and of large payments made to a small group of spine surgeons bears cautious oversight, both for the future of the specialty and any impact on patient care outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available