4.3 Article

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with locomotor training to improve walking ability in people with chronic spinal cord injury: study protocol for an international multi-centred double-blinded randomised sham-controlled trial (eWALK)

Journal

SPINAL CORD
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 491-497

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00734-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SpinalCure Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to determine the effect of transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with locomotor training on walking ability in individuals with spinal cord injury. Through a 12-week randomized trial, the study will evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes of walking ability.
Study design An international multi-centred, double-blinded, randomised sham-controlled trial (eWALK). Objective To determine the effect of 12 weeks of transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) combined with locomotor training on walking ability in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting Dedicated SCI research centres in Australia, Spain, USA and Scotland. Methods Fifty community-dwelling individuals with chronic SCI will be recruited. Participants will be eligible if they have bilateral motor levels between T1 and T11, a reproducible lower limb muscle contraction in at least one muscle group, and a Walking Index for SCI II (WISCI II) between 1 and 6. Eligible participants will be randomised to one of two groups, either the active stimulation group or the sham stimulation group. Participants allocated to the stimulation group will receive TSS combined with locomotor training for three 30-min sessions a week for 12 weeks. The locomotor sessions will include walking on a treadmill and overground. Participants allocated to the sham stimulation group will receive the same locomotor training combined with sham stimulation. The primary outcome will be walking ability with stimulation using the WISCI II. Secondary outcomes will record sensation, strength, spasticity, bowel function and quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available