4.6 Article

Rapid determination of ultra-trace plutonium in large volume of urine samples by tandem quadrupole inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2021.106259

Keywords

Plutonium isotopes; Urine; Tandem quadrupole ICP-MS; NH3/He model

Categories

Funding

  1. China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP)
  2. Scientific Research Program for Young Talents of the China National Nuclear Corporation
  3. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [41877449]
  4. State Key Labo-ratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology [SKLLQG1927]
  5. Environmental Radioactivity Network Center (ERAN) [I-21-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid bioassay method for plutonium in urine samples was developed using tandem quadrupole ICP-MS combined with a high-efficiency sample introduction system. The method was validated by analyzing urine samples spiked with known amounts of Pu-239 and Pu-240, with detection limits estimated to be 0.83fg for Pu-239 and 0.14fg for Pu-240 in 1L of urine.
Rapid bioassay method for plutonium in urine samples are employed to assess the possible internal dose resulting from exposure to plutonium in the event of a radiological and nuclear emergency. In this work, a rapid method for the determination of plutonium isotopes (Pu-239 and Pu-240) in large volume of urine samples was developed using tandem quadrupole ICP-MS combined with a high-efficiency sample introduction system (APEX-Omega). The mixture gases of NH3 and He was employed to effectively eliminate the tailing of U-238 and the uranium hydride ions ((UH+)-U-238-H-1 and (UH2+)-U-238-H-1) and significantly improve the measurement sensitivity of plutonium. The method was validated by analyzing urine samples spiked with known amounts of( )(239)Pu and Pu-240 ranging from 1 to 60 fg. The detection limits for the method were estimated to be 0.83 fg for Pu-239, 0.14 fg for Pu-240 in 1 L of urine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available