4.7 Article

An ESIPT-based fluorescent probe with fast-response for detection of hydrogen sulfide in mitochondria

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120390

Keywords

Fluorescent probe; Hydrogen sulfide; Excited-state intramolecular proton transfer; Mitochondria-targeting

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2020L0545]
  2. Xinzhou Teachers University Fund [2019KY09]
  3. Xinzhou Teachers University PhD startup fund [00000460]
  4. Fund for Shanxi 1331 Project Key Subjects Construction
  5. Top Science and Technology Innovation Teams of Xinzhou Teachers University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The designed fluorescent probe HBTP-H2S based on ESIPT effect showed fast response time, good selectivity and a large Stokes shift towards H2S, and was successfully employed to monitor mitochondrial H2S in HepG2 cells.
Excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) has recently received considerable attention due to its dual fluorescent changes and large Stokes shift. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a gas signal molecule that plays important roles in modulating the functions of different systems. Herein, by modifying 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl) benzothiazole (HBT) scaffold, a novel near-infrared mitochondria-targeted fluorescent probe HBTP-H2S has been rationally designed based on excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) effect. The nucleophilic addition reaction of the H2S with probe HBTP-H2S caused the break of the conjugated skeleton, resulting the shifting of maximum emission peak from 658 nm to 470 nm. HBTP-H2S showed fast-response response time, good selectivity and a large Stokes shift (188 nm) toward H2S. Most importantly, inspired by the inherent advantages of the probe, HBTP-H2S was successfully employed to monitor mitochondrial H2S in HepG2 cells. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available