4.6 Article

In-situ XRD study on the selenisation parameters driving Ga/In interdiffusion in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 in a versatile, industrially-relevant selenisation furnace

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages 1085-1094

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.11.032

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs [TEZ0214012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The selenisation process of Cu-Ga-In metallic precursors was studied using in-situ X-ray diffraction, revealing the significant impact of Se crucible temperature and sample temperature on the interdiffusion of Ga and In. Strategies to gain better control over the GGI depth profile, and hence bandgap profile, were discussed in light of the results demonstrating the versatility of the setup.
The selenisation of Cu-Ga-In metallic precursors is investigated by in-situ X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) in a selenisation tool which mimics at the laboratory scale an industrial tool (thus fully scalable) and allows fine control over the selenisation parameters and reproducibility. In this setup, the interdiffusion of Ga and In was significantly accelerated by decreasing the Se crucible temperature or increasing the sample temperature. Applying a lower Se crucible temperature yielded a very fast initial interdiffusion that quickly reached a steady-state, non-flat Ga/(Ga + In) (GGI) depth profile. On the other hand, the higher crucible temperature tested led to a slower interdiffusion which kept evolving to a flatter GGI profile after a sufficiently long dwell time at the maximum temperature. Strategies to gain better control over the GGI profile, and hence bandgap profile, are discussed. The results indicate that the versatility of the setup is key to achieving fine control over the GGI depth profile, which is particularly relevant today, when new alkali doping strategies are being introduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available