4.7 Article

Seismic response of helical pile groups from shake table experiments

Journal

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107008

Keywords

Helical piles; Seismic response; Shake table; Soil-pile interaction; Group behaviour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents and discusses the responses of single and grouped helical piles to strong ground motions during large-scale shake table testing, evaluating the effects of earthquake characteristics on their seismic performance. The study also delves into the interaction between piles within a group and the contributions of individual pile stiffness to the overall capacity of the pile group. Additionally, the impact of pile head connection to the pile cap on the pile group's response is evaluated and compared between fixed and pinned pile groups.
This paper presents and discusses the measured responses of single and grouped helical piles to strong ground motions during a large-scale shake table testing program. The effects of earthquake characteristics (i.e., intensity and frequency content) on the seismic performance of single and grouped helical piles are evaluated from the measured responses. In addition, the performance characteristics of helical pile groups are discussed in terms of the interaction between piles within a group and the contributions of vertical and lateral stiffness of individual piles to the rocking stiffness and the overall capacity of the pile group. Furthermore, the effect of pile head connection to the pile cap (fixed or pinned) on the pile group's response is evaluated and the responses of fixed pile groups (2-bolts connection) and pinned pile groups (1-bolt connection) are compared. Finally, the behaviour of a single pile and a pile within a group is compared in terms of their normalized responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available