4.7 Article

Revisiting the quantitative contribution of microbial necromass to soil carbon pool: Stoichiometric control by microbes and soil

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108486

Keywords

Microbial necromass; C/N ratio; Amino sugar; Microbial biomass; Soil organic carbon

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFD0800103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31930070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revisits the quantitative contribution of microbial necromass to the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool by considering the stoichiometric differences of microbes and the full range of the microbial necromass proportion in soil. The results show that the potential contribution of microbial necromass to SOC pool is controlled by the stoichiometry of microbes and soil.
Quantitative assessments of soil microbial necromass improve our knowledge of soil carbon (C) sequestration, which is vital for addressing climate change and food security. Here, we revisit the quantitative contribution of microbial necmmass to soil organic C (SOC) pool by using an optimized strategy that considers the stoichiometric differences of microbes and the full range of the microbial necromass proportion in soil nitrogen (N) pool. We derive a more applicable estimate of the microbial necromass contribution to SOC pool, reporting a narrower average range (24%-60%) compared with those in recent publications. We further find that the potential contribution of microbial necromass to SOC pool is controlled by the stoichiometry (C/N ratio) of microbes and soil. We suggest soil C sequestration strategy by increasing microbial necmmass should well be exploited to improve soil N availability and use microbial species associated with high biomass C/N ratio to boost C accrual.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available