4.6 Article

3D or not 3D: a guide to assess cell viability in 3D cell systems

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 2222-2233

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm00018k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-515-56005, 20-315-90095]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [21-15-00339]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [21-15-00339] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell viability is an important parameter for evaluating tissue equivalents and chemicals, and analyzing 3D cell systems requires a combination of multiple methods to obtain accurate results.
Cell viability is the primary integrative parameter used for various purposes, particularly when fabricating tissue equivalents (e.g., using bioprinting or scaffolding techniques), optimizing conditions to cultivate cells, testing chemicals, drugs, and biomaterials, etc. Most of the conventional methods were originally designed for a monolayer (2D) culture; however, 2D approaches fail to adequately assess a tissue-engineered construct's viability and drug effects and recapitulate the host-pathogen interactions and infectivity. This study aims at revealing the influence of particular 3D cell systems' parameters such as the components' concentration, gel thickness, cell density, etc. on the cell viability and applicability of standard assays. Here, we present an approach to achieving adequate and reproducible results on the cell viability in 3D collagen- and fibrin-based systems using the Live/Dead, AlamarBlue, and PicoGreen assays. Our results have demonstrated that a routine precise analysis of 3D systems should be performed using a combination of at least three methods based on different cell properties, e.g. the metabolic activity, proliferative capacity, morphology, etc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available