4.6 Article

Moving cracks in drying colloidal films

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 2252-2275

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sm01568k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IIT Bombay
  2. SERB, Department of Science and Technology, India [EMR/2017/001630]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the dynamics of cracks in colloidal coatings and derives an analytical solution. The study considers the stress and displacement fields near the crack tip under different crack speeds, taking into account factors such as particle volume fraction and mechanical properties. However, the predicted crack speeds are at least an order of magnitude higher than those observed in experiments, and further research is needed to explain this discrepancy.
Drying colloidal films are encountered in many applications ranging from paints and coatings to ceramic and semiconductor processing. In many cases, shrinkage stresses are generated during drying, which can fracture the film. While much of the previous experimental and theoretical work has focused on cracking in static cracks, there are very few studies on the dynamics of cracks in colloidal coatings. Here, we derive an analytical solution for the stress, displacement, and pressure fields near the crack tip for a steadily moving crack. We consider first the two extreme cases, namely, the undrained limit where the crack motion is much faster than the Darcy flow rate and the opposite extreme of very slow crack propagation, the drained limit. Next, we consider the general case where the timescale for crack-tip motion is comparable to that for the interstitial flow. The results incorporate the micro-structural details of the system including the particle volume fraction and nature of packing, and the mechanical properties of the particles such as shear modulus and Poisson's ratio. While the predicted results are in line with those for brittle materials, the predicted crack speeds are at least an order of magnitude higher than those observed in experiments. We conclude with the possible reasons for the discrepancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available