4.5 Article

Motherhood and theory of mind: increased activation in the posterior cingulate cortex and insulae

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 470-481

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab109

Keywords

fMRI; theory of mind; affective theory of mind; motherhood; children

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01KR1803C]
  2. 'Dissertation Plus' program of the Claussen-Simon-Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite limited knowledge on the influence of parenthood on theory of mind, this study revealed differences in neural activation between mothers and non-mothers when inferring mental states of others. These differences were not specific to children and may indicate that mothers and non-mothers employ different strategies in inferring action intentions from affective faces.
Despite growing evidence on effects of parenthood on social understanding, little is known about the influence of parenthood on theory of mind (ToM), the capacity to infer mental and affective states of others. It is also unclear whether any possible effects of parenthood on ToM would generalise to inferring states of adults or are specific to children. We investigated neural activation in mothers and women without children while they predicted action intentions from child and adult faces. Region-of-interest analyses showed stronger activation in mothers in the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus (ToM-related areas) and insulae (emotion-related areas). Whole-brain analyses revealed that mothers compared to non-mothers more strongly activated areas including the left angular gyrus and the ventral prefrontal cortex but less strongly activated the right supramarginal gyrus and the dorsal prefrontal cortex. These differences were not specific to child stimuli but occurred in response to both adult and child stimuli and might indicate that mothers and non-mothers employ different strategies to infer action intentions from affective faces. Whether these general differences in affective ToM between mothers and non-mothers are due to biological or experience-related changes should be subject of further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available