4.6 Article

Preparation and performance of graphene oxide/self-healing microcapsule composite mortar

Journal

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/ac4577

Keywords

graphene; microcapsules; self-repair of cement-based materials; compressive strength; resistance

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1505305]
  2. National Major Scientific Instruments Development Project of China [41627801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microcapsules synthesized using special materials can enhance the durability and resistance of concrete materials. The addition of graphene improves the compressive strength and self-repairing effect of the composite material.
In order to solve the special needs for the durability and resistance of concrete materials in power transmission projects in Northwest China. Using sodium silicate and bentonite as capsule core and ethyl cellulose as capsule wall, microcapsules were synthesized by physical method. Standard specimens of cement-based materials were prepared by adding graphene oxide as conductive medium. Indoor experiments and micro technology were used to determine the optimal ratio of graphene-microcapsules, study the effects of graphene content, microcapsule content, and curing age on compressive strength, resistance, and self-repairing effect of the composite material. The results show that the average size of microcapsules was about 1.25 mm. The microcapsule was a relatively regular sphere with rough surface and dense structure. The recommended content was 2% microcapsules and 0.1% graphene oxide. With the increase of microcapsules and graphene oxide, the compressive strength first increased and then decreased, and the resistance increased gradually. After the cracks were repaired, the repairing rate of compressive strength was 57% and the recovery rate was 81%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available