4.6 Review

A scoping review of behavioral sleep stage classification methods for preterm infants

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 74-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.01.006

Keywords

Sleep; Preterm infant; Behavior; Observation; Human Score

Funding

  1. EU - European Commission [813483]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to summarize and evaluate the behavioral sleep stage classification methods (BSSCs) used for preterm infants. The results revealed the existence of different BSSCs, but they vary in terms of sleep stage criteria, validity, and reliability. Further research and validation are needed to improve the comparability and reproducibility of preterm sleep studies.
Background: Sleep is paramount for optimal brain development in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Besides (minimally) invasive technical approaches to study sleep in infants, there is currently a large variety of behavioral sleep stage classification methods (BSSCs) that can be used to identify sleep stages in preterm infants born <37 weeks gestational age. However, they operate different criteria to define sleep stages, which limits the comparability and reproducibility of research on preterm sleep. This scoping review aims to: 1) identify and elaborate on existing neonatal BSSCs used for preterm infants, 2) examine the reliability and validity of these BSSCs, and 3) identify which criteria are most used for different ages, ranging from 23 to 37 weeks postmenstrual age at observation. Methods: To map the existing BSSCs, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched for studies using a BSSC to identify sleep stages in preterm infants. Results: In total, 36 BSSCs were identified with on average five item categories assessed per BSSC, most frequently: eyes, body movements, facial movements, sounds, and respiratory pattern. Furthermore, validity and reliability of the BSSCs were tested in less than half of the included studies. Finally, BSSCs were used in infants of all ages, regardless the age for which the BSSC was originally developed. Conclusions: Items used for scoring in the different BSSCs were relatively consistent. The age ranges, reliability, and validity of the BSSCs were not consistently reported in most studies. Either validation studies of existing BSSCs or new BSSCs are necessary to improve the comparability and reproducibility of previous and future preterm behavioral sleep studies. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available