4.6 Article

Variational graph autoencoders for multiview canonical correlation analysis

Journal

SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108182

Keywords

Canonical correlation analysis; Dimensionality reduction; Multiview representation learning; Graph neurals networks; Variational inference

Funding

  1. IFCAM project [MA/IFCAM/19/56]
  2. ACADEMICS Grant of IDEXLYON, Univ. Lyon, PIA [ANR-16-IDEX-0005]
  3. ANR project DataRedux [ANR-19-CE46-0008]
  4. CBP IT test platform (ENS de Lyon, France)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel approach for multiview canonical correlation analysis based on a variational graph neural network model, which combines the probabilistic interpretation of CCA with an autoencoder architecture based on graph convolutional neural network layers. Experimental results show that the proposed method performs well on classification, clustering, and recommendation tasks, and is competitive with state-of-the-art multiview representation learning techniques, while maintaining scalability and robustness to instances with missing views.
We present a novel approach for multiview canonical correlation analysis based on a variational graph neural network model. We propose a nonlinear model which takes into account the available graph based geometric constraints while being scalable to large-scale datasets with multiple views. This model combines the probabilistic interpretation of CCA with an autoencoder architecture based on graph convolutional neural network layers. Experiments with the proposed method are conducted on classification, clustering, and recommendation tasks on real datasets. The algorithm is competitive with state-of-the-art multiview representation learning techniques, in addition to being scalable and robust to instances with missing views. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available