4.7 Article

Ultrasound-assisted pressurized liquid extraction of anthocyanins from Aronia melanocarpa pomace

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 276, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119290

Keywords

Black chokeberry; Polyphenols; Pressurized liquid extraction; Sonication; Enhanced extraction; Extraction kinetics

Funding

  1. European Union [778168]
  2. Miljostyrelsen via the Gront Udviklings og Demonstrations Program (GUPD) [34009-18-1358]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the optimum conditions for ultrasonic-assisted pressurized liquid extraction of anthocyanins from Aronia melanocarpa pomace. Through optimization of pressure, temperature, ultrasound intensity, and solvent concentration, the total anthocyanin content extracted was increased by 19% at 80 degrees Celsius.
This work aimed to investigate the optimum conditions of pressure, temperature, ultrasound intensity, solvent concentration and solvent flowrate of ultrasound-assisted pressurized liquid extraction of anthocyanins from Aronia melanocarpa pomace. The novel setup operates with an aqueous solution of citric acid as extraction solvent. The optimization was performed in order to maximize the total anthocyanins content extracted from the pomace. The optimized conditions of 70 degrees C, 180 bar, a solvent concentration of 1.5 % wt. citric acid, in a 200 W ultrasound bath were obtained. These conditions resulted in 88.0 % wt. extraction of anthocyanins in 45 min. A kinetic study was performed to study the influence of the temperature on the total anthocyanin yield obtained at the optimal extraction conditions. Moreover, the component stability was assessed to prove that the system could successfully operate at 80 degrees C. Compared to classical batch extraction using the same solvent concentration and feedstock, the total anthocyanin content of the extract was increased by 19%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available