4.7 Article

Capacitive deionization characteristics of compressed granular activated carbon

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119454

Keywords

Capacitive deionization; Granular activated carbon; Desalination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally investigated the possibility of using granular activated carbon (GAC) for capacitive deionization (CDI) electrodes and found that compressing GAC significantly improved ion removal. The effect of applied voltage on salt adsorption capacity was also studied, showing that the CDI cell with compressed GAC achieved a salt adsorption capacity comparable to other CDIs in previous studies, making it a potential cost-effective desalination technology.
Capacitive deionization (CDI) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years as an energy-efficient and costeffective desalination technology. In addition to its low cost, granular activated carbon (GAC) satisfies the general requirements for the CDI electrodes. In this study, the possibility of using GAC for CDI electrodes was investigated experimentally. When GAC is packed into a CDI cell as the electrodes without pressure, the amount of ion removal was small due to high electric resistance of the GAC electrodes. When the GAC was then compressed between the current collectors of a cylindrical reactor, the amount of ion removal improved significantly due to a drastic decrease in the electric resistance. In consideration of the ohmic drops in the CDI cell with compressed GAC, the effect of applied voltage on salt adsorption capacity (SAC) was also studied experimentally. It was shown that the SAC reached 9.8 mg/g at 2.0 V. This SAC is comparable to other CDIs in the previous studies. Therefore, our CDI cell with compressed GAC is a potential alternative to conventional methods as a costeffective desalination technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available