4.7 Article

Effect of chemical treatment and intrinsic resistance on the humidity sensitivity of pencil graphite sensing material coated on paper substrate

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
Volume 332, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2021.113085

Keywords

Graphite-on-paper; Humidity sensor; Resistivity; Chemical treatment; Ethanol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the humidity sensitivity of graphite pencil marks on paper as sensing material was demonstrated, with ethanol treatment improving the sensitivity. Sensors with different resistances were tested, showing that ethanol-treated sensors had better sensitivity proportional to their resistance. Comparison with other carbon materials like carbon quantum dots film, carbon nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide and graphene was also conducted for evaluation.
In this study, we have demonstrated the humidity sensitivity of graphite pencil marks sensing material drawn on paper. The fabricated sensing devices (sensors) were characterized for their humidity sensitivity by measuring the resistance changes across the pencil marks. In order to improve the humidity sensitivity of the sensing material, ethanol chemical treatment was applied on the pencil marks to increase their surface hydrophilicity. Sensors with different levels of intrinsic resistances were also prepared and tested. Results showed that the ethanol-treated sensors have better humidity sensitivities and the intrinsic resistances of the sensors were directly proportional to their humidity sensitivity. To evaluate this carbonbased sensing material, the humidity sensing characteristics of the pencil graphite were gauged with other forms of carbon materials that have been reported in previous studies, such as carbon quantum dots film, carbon nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide and graphene. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available