4.6 Article

Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Based on Monte Carlo Simulation Using Photoplethysmography Signals

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22031175

Keywords

blood pressure; cuffless; Monte Carlo simulation; photoplethysmography; machine learning

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT, Future Planning [2015R1A5A7037615]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Education [NRF-2019R1F1A1062317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blood pressure measurements are commonly performed medical tests. This study proposes a cuffless blood pressure estimation model using Monte Carlo simulation and photoplethysmography signals, which can effectively estimate blood pressure.
Blood pressure measurements are one of the most routinely performed medical tests globally. Blood pressure is an important metric since it provides information that can be used to diagnose several vascular diseases. Conventional blood pressure measurement systems use cuff-based devices to measure the blood pressure, which may be uncomfortable and sometimes burdensome to the subjects. Therefore, in this study, we propose a cuffless blood pressure estimation model based on Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). We propose a heterogeneous finger model for the MCS at wavelengths of 905 nm and 940 nm. After recording the photon intensities from the MCS over a certain range of blood pressure values, the actual photoplethysmography (PPG) signals were used to estimate blood pressure. We used both publicly available and self-made datasets to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. In case of the publicly available dataset for transmission-type MCS, the mean absolute errors are 3.32 +/- 6.03 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), 2.02 +/- 2.64 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and 1.76 +/- 2.8 mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP). The self-made dataset is used for both transmission- and reflection-type MCSs; its mean absolute errors are 2.54 +/- 4.24 mmHg for SBP, 1.49 +/- 2.82 mmHg for DBP, and 1.51 +/- 2.41 mmHg for MAP in the transmission-type case as well as 3.35 +/- 5.06 mmHg for SBP, 2.07 +/- 2.83 mmHg for DBP, and 2.12 +/- 2.83 mmHg for MAP in the reflection-type case. The estimated results of the SBP and DBP satisfy the requirements of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards and are within Grade A according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS) standards. These results show that the proposed model is efficient for estimating blood pressures using fingertip PPG signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available