4.6 Article

Two-Hop Energy Consumption Balanced Routing Algorithm for Solar Insecticidal Lamp Internet of Things

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22010154

Keywords

energy consumption balanced routing; Solar Insecticidal Lamps Internet of Things; geographic forwarding; two-hop information

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62072248]
  2. Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX(21)3060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A routing algorithm named THECB is proposed in this research to reduce data forwarding traffic of nodes and weaken unpredictable electromagnetic interference in communication. Experiment results show that THECB outperforms the TPGFPlus algorithm under various conditions.
Due to the sparsity deployment of nodes, the full connection requirement, and the unpredictable electromagnetic interference on communication caused by high voltage pulse current of Solar Insecticidal Lamps Internet of Things (SIL-IoTs), a Two-Hop Energy Consumption Balanced routing algorithm (THECB) is proposed in this research work. THECB selects next-hop nodes according to 1-hop and 2-hop neighbors' information. In addition, the greedy forwarding mechanism is expressed in the form of probability; that is, each neighbor node is given a weight between 0 and 1 according to the distance. THECB reduces the data forwarding traffic of nodes whose discharge numbers are relatively higher than those of other nodes so that the unpredictable electromagnetic interference on communication can be weakened. We compare the energy consumption, energy consumption balance, and data forwarding traffic over various discharge numbers, network densities, and transmission radius. The results indicate that THECB achieves better performance than Two-Phase Geographic Greedy Forwarding plus (TPGFPlus), which ignores the requirement of the node-disjoint path.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available