4.6 Article

How Long Should GPS Recording Lengths Be to Capture the Community Mobility of An Older Clinical Population? A Parkinson's Example

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22020563

Keywords

wearable technology; community mobility; GPS; older adults; Parkinson's disease; recording technique; sampling length

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wearable GPS technology can assist in monitoring and maintaining the mobility level of older populations and people with movement disorders. This study recommends a standard minimum duration for GPS recording based on empirical evidence from older adults with Parkinson's disease.
Wearable global position system (GPS) technology can help those working with older populations and people living with movement disorders monitor and maintain their mobility level. Health research using GPS often employs inconsistent recording lengths due to the lack of a standard minimum GPS recording length for a clinical context. Our work aimed to recommend a GPS recording length for an older clinical population. Over 14 days, 70 older adults with Parkinson's disease wore the wireless inertial motion unit with GPS (WIMU-GPS) during waking hours to capture daily time outside, trip count, hotspots count and area size travelled. The longest recording length accounting for weekend and weekdays was >= 7 days of >= 800 daily minutes of data (14 participants with 156, 483.9 min recorded). We compared the error rate generated when using data based on recording lengths shorter than this sample. The smallest percentage errors were observed across all outcomes, except hotspots count, with daily recordings >= 500 min (8.3 h). Eight recording days will capture mobility variability throughout days of the week. This study adds empirical evidence to the sensor literature on the required minimum duration of GPS recording.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available