4.6 Article

Characterization and Comparison of Biodegradable Printed Capacitive Humidity Sensors

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21196557

Keywords

humidity sensor; biodegradable sensor; capacitive sensor; inkjet printed; interdigitated electrodes (IDE); relative humidity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE 1752814]
  2. AFRI Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2020-67021-32855, 1024262]
  3. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy award [DE-AR0001013]
  4. [2020-67021-32855/]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study characterizes and compares the performance of humidity sensors printed on different biodegradable substrates, with paper and starch sensors showing the highest overall sensitivity but longer response and recovery times with significant hysteresis. The relationship between humidity and capacitance across the sensors can be modeled by exponential growth, with different substrates exhibiting unique sensitivities and behaviors.
Flexible and biodegradable sensors are advantageous for their versatility in a range of areas from smart packaging to agriculture. In this work, we characterize and compare the performance of interdigitated electrode (IDE) humidity sensors printed on different biodegradable substrates. In these IDE capacitive devices, the substrate acts as the sensing layer. The dielectric constant of the substrate increases as the material absorbs water from the atmosphere. Consequently, the capacitance across the electrodes is a function of environmental relative humidity. Here, the performance of polylactide (PLA), glossy paper, and potato starch as a sensing layer is compared to that of nonbiodegradable polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The capacitance across inkjet-printed silver electrodes is measured in environmental conditions ranging from 15 to 90% relative humidity. The sensitivity, response time, hysteresis, and temperature dependency are compared for the sensors. The relationship between humidity and capacitance across the sensors can be modeled by exponential growth with an R-2 value of 0.99, with paper and starch sensors having the highest overall sensitivity. The PET and PLA sensors have response and recovery times under 5 min and limited hysteresis. However, the paper and starch sensors have response and recovery times closer to 20 min, with significant hysteresis around 100%. The PET and starch sensors are temperature independent, while the PLA and paper sensors display thermal drift that increases with temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available